Messages in this thread |  | | Date | Wed, 19 Sep 2001 15:21:09 -0400 (EDT) | From | Alexander Viro <> | Subject | Re: Linux 2.4.10-pre11 |
| |
On Wed, 19 Sep 2001, Andrea Arcangeli wrote:
> Quite frankly the BDEV_* handling was and is a total mess IMHO, even if > it was written by you ;), there was no difference at all from many of > them, I didn't fixed that but I had to check all them on the differences > until I realized there was none. I also think the other things you
There certainly _are_ differences (e.g. in handling the moment when you close them).
> mentioned (besides the inode pinning bug, non critical) are not buggy
_What_?
int fd = open("/dev/ram0", O_RDWR); ioctl(fd, BLKFLSBUF); ioctl(fd, BLKFLSBUF);
and you claim that resulting oops is not a bug?
> (infact I never had a single report), but well we'll verify that in
Richard, is that you? What had you done with real Andrea?
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
|  |