lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2001]   [Sep]   [19]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: Linux 2.4.10-pre11


On Wed, 19 Sep 2001, Andrea Arcangeli wrote:

> Quite frankly the BDEV_* handling was and is a total mess IMHO, even if
> it was written by you ;), there was no difference at all from many of
> them, I didn't fixed that but I had to check all them on the differences
> until I realized there was none. I also think the other things you

There certainly _are_ differences (e.g. in handling the moment
when you close them).

> mentioned (besides the inode pinning bug, non critical) are not buggy

_What_?

int fd = open("/dev/ram0", O_RDWR);
ioctl(fd, BLKFLSBUF);
ioctl(fd, BLKFLSBUF);

and you claim that resulting oops is not a bug?

> (infact I never had a single report), but well we'll verify that in

Richard, is that you? What had you done with real Andrea?

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:03    [W:0.106 / U:4.616 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site