[lkml]   [2001]   [Sep]   [19]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: Magic SysRq +# in 2.4.9-ac/2.4.10-pre12
    > Anyway, in looking at SysRq loglevel handling in
    > 2.4.9-ac (and 2.4.10-pre12), I see that it has been modified
    > quite a bit. Looks extensible, which can be good.
    > However, looking over it gave me several nagging questions
    > and problems.
    > 1. Was this stuff tested? How ???

    Its been in the ac tree for about 6 months and in several distro shippings

    > If someone (Crutcher ?) wants to patch it, that's fine.
    > If I patched it, I would just add a
    > next_loglevel = -1;
    > at the beginning of __handle_sysrq_nolock() and then
    > let the loglevel handler(s) set next_loglevel.
    > If next_loglevel != -1 at the end of __handle_sysrq_nolock(),
    > set console_loglevel to next_loglevel.

    Send me a patch and cc Linus/Crutcher
    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to
    More majordomo info at
    Please read the FAQ at

     \ /
      Last update: 2005-03-22 13:03    [W:5.470 / U:0.004 seconds]
    ©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site