Messages in this thread |  | | Subject | Re: Magic SysRq +# in 2.4.9-ac/2.4.10-pre12 | Date | Wed, 19 Sep 2001 17:42:54 +0100 (BST) | From | Alan Cox <> |
| |
> Anyway, in looking at SysRq loglevel handling in > 2.4.9-ac (and 2.4.10-pre12), I see that it has been modified > quite a bit. Looks extensible, which can be good. > However, looking over it gave me several nagging questions > and problems. > > 1. Was this stuff tested? How ???
Its been in the ac tree for about 6 months and in several distro shippings
> If someone (Crutcher ?) wants to patch it, that's fine. > If I patched it, I would just add a > next_loglevel = -1; > at the beginning of __handle_sysrq_nolock() and then > let the loglevel handler(s) set next_loglevel. > If next_loglevel != -1 at the end of __handle_sysrq_nolock(), > set console_loglevel to next_loglevel.
Send me a patch and cc Linus/Crutcher - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
|  |