lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2001]   [Sep]   [17]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: broken VM in 2.4.10-pre9

On Mon, 17 Sep 2001, Stephan von Krawczynski wrote:
>
> > However, at the same time I'd really like to hear about improved
> > behaviour, not just "feels the same". And certainly not "(maybe even
> > worse.."
>
> Hm, sorry for that. But that's what I see. Maybe the problem is now on a
> different field.

Heh. I wasn't blaming you. The code obviously leaves something to be
desired, still.

> BTW: I tried Andrea's brand new patch and have to admit it has a _big_
> performance gain, though I understand you dislike the design very much.

I only dislike one aspect of it, not the whole patch. Andrea has spent a
lot of time doing tuning, which is hugely important for real-world
workloads. I also suspect from previous patches that he increases
read-ahead aggressively etc.

I'll take a look,

Linus

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:03    [W:0.048 / U:2.288 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site