lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2001]   [Sep]   [17]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH] A nicer nice scheduling
Roberto Ragusa wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> please consider including this patch in the main kernel.
> It was proposed on 11/04/2001 by Rik van Riel
> ([test-PATCH] Re: [QUESTION] 2.4.x nice level)
>
> This patch has been working great for me, I applied it to
> every new kernel out.
>
> Without this patch, a nice=19 busy-looping process is given
> 15% of CPU cycles when there is a busy-looping nice=0 process.
> [...]

I think it's simpler to change NICE_TO_TICKS() macro in sched.c


Bye.

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:03    [W:0.031 / U:0.812 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site