lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2001]   [Sep]   [16]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
    /
    Date
    From
    SubjectRe: 2.4.10pre7aa1
    On Mon, 10 Sep 2001, Andrea Arcangeli wrote:

    > > My problem with this appropech is just that we use kernel threads for
    > > more and more stuff - always creating new ones. I think at some point
    > > they will sum up badly.
    >
    > They almost only costs memory. I also don't like unnecessary kernel
    > threads but I can see usefulness for this one, OTOH as you said the
    > latency of the wait_for_rcu isn't very critical but usually I prefer to
    > save cycles with memory where I can and where it's even cleaner to do so.

    I can't quite remember if it was Linus or Larry who said:

    "Threads are for people who don't understand state machines"


    If you cannot make your code clean without adding another
    thread, it's probably a bad sign ;)

    cheers,

    Rik
    --
    IA64: a worthy successor to i860.

    http://www.surriel.com/ http://distro.conectiva.com/

    Send all your spam to aardvark@nl.linux.org (spam digging piggy)

    -
    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
    More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
    Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

    \
     
     \ /
      Last update: 2005-03-22 13:03    [W:0.030 / U:59.444 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site