Messages in this thread |  | | Date | Thu, 13 Sep 2001 22:01:18 -0700 | From | Matthew Dharm <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH] Endian-ness bugs in yellowfin.c |
| |
I would agree that listing them under the highest capable is probably the best. It is, at least, consistent with the 10/100 cards.
Also, people will pick up the card, think "gigabit ethernet", and then look under the 1000 section. I don't think anyone will really think GigE and then look under 10/100.
The Intel 82543 and 82544 gigabit parts are all 10/100/1000 -- I'll be writing a driver for those in a few weeks if nobody beats me to it, so I think it would be good to settle this.
Matt
On Thu, Sep 13, 2001 at 08:02:37PM -0700, Tom Rini wrote: > On Thu, Sep 13, 2001 at 08:55:01PM -0600, Val Henson wrote: > > On Thu, Sep 13, 2001 at 07:39:37PM -0700, Tom Rini wrote: > > > On Thu, Sep 13, 2001 at 07:51:41PM -0600, Val Henson wrote: > > > > - tristate ' Symbios 53c885 (Synergy ethernet) support' CONFIG_NCR885E > > > > + tristate ' Symbios 53c885 (Synergy ethernet) support' CONFIG_YELLOWFIN > > > > > > Since you're killing this, why not just remove this question entirely? > > > > This is one of the "design decisions" I referred to. It makes no > > sense to list a 100 Mbit driver under "Ethernet (1000 Mbit)". This is > > my solution. This is the first case of a dual 1000/100 Mbit driver > > and if there's a better way to handle it I'd like to hear it. > > Er, sungem does 10/100/1000 too I think.. (It's what's in the new G4 > towers..). IMHO, listing it once under the greatest makes sense. But > sungem/gmac are under 10/100 I think. > > -- > Tom Rini (TR1265) > http://gate.crashing.org/~trini/ > - > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in > the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html > Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
-- Matthew Dharm Home: mdharm-usb@one-eyed-alien.net Maintainer, Linux USB Mass Storage Driver
C: They kicked your ass, didn't they? S: They were cheating! -- The Chief and Stef User Friendly, 11/19/1997 [unhandled content-type:application/pgp-signature] |  |