[lkml]   [2001]   [Sep]   [13]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: OOPS handling proposal
On Sep 13, 2001  06:11 +0000, Samium Gromoff wrote:
> Hello folks!
> People most likely needs first oops most of the time, so
> it would be great to make a kernel boot option to stop after
> first oops, so in the situations when its neede life can be made easy.
> Actually afaics this is being done each time by hand, so
> panic() in BUG() as Rik proposed would be nice.
> What do you folks think?

Absolutely NOT. If you panic() in BUG() then you DO have to copy the oops
by hand each time, whereas the normal situation is that you can keep
running after an oops - to decode it, see what the symptoms are, check
memory, etc.

Cheers, Andreas
Andreas Dilger \ "If a man ate a pound of pasta and a pound of antipasto,
\ would they cancel out, leaving him still hungry?" -- Dogbert

To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:03    [W:0.048 / U:1.524 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site