[lkml]   [2001]   [Sep]   [11]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: linux-2.4.10-pre5

On Mon, 10 Sep 2001, Rik van Riel wrote:
> >
> > Pre-loading your cache always depends on some limited portion of
> > prescience.
> OTOH, agressively pre-loading metadata should be ok in a lot
> of cases, because metadata is very small, but wastes about
> half of our disk time because of the seeks ...

I actually agree to some degree here. The main reason I agree is that
meta-data often is (a) known to be physically contiguous (so pre-fecthing
is easy and cheap on most hardwate) and (b) meta-data _is_ small, so you
don't have to prefetch very much (so pre-fetching is not all that

Trying to read two or more pages of inode data whenever we fetch an inode
might not be a bad idea, for example. Either we fetch a _lot_ of inodes
(in which case the prefetching is very likely to get a hit anyway), or we
don't (in which case the prefetching is unlikely to hurt all that much
either). You don't easily get into a situation where you prefetch a lot
without gaining anything.

We might do other kinds of opportunistic pre-fetching, like have "readdir"
start prefetching for the inode data it finds. That miht be a win for many
loads (and it might be a loss too - there _are_ loads that really only
care about the filename, although I suspect they are fairly rare).


To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:03    [W:0.103 / U:2.828 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site