Messages in this thread |  | | Date | Tue, 11 Sep 2001 17:23:01 +0530 | From | Dipankar Sarma <> | Subject | Re: 2.4.10pre7aa1 |
| |
In article <20010911131238.N715@athlon.random> you wrote: > many thanks. At the moment my biggest concern is about the need of > call_rcu not to be starved by RT threads (keventd can be starved so then > it won't matter if krcud is RT because we won't start using it).
> Andrea
I think we can avoid keventd altogether by using a periodic timer (say 10ms) to check for completion of an RC update. The timer may be active only if only if there is any RCU going on in the system - that way we still don't have any impact on the rest of the kernel.
I am working on such a thing - but it will take me a little bit of time to figure out how to do this in linux.
Thanks Dipankar -- Dipankar Sarma <dipankar@in.ibm.com> Project: http://lse.sourceforge.net Linux Technology Center, IBM Software Lab, Bangalore, India. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
|  |