lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2001]   [Sep]   [11]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: 2.4.10pre7aa1
In article <20010911131238.N715@athlon.random> you wrote:
> many thanks. At the moment my biggest concern is about the need of
> call_rcu not to be starved by RT threads (keventd can be starved so then
> it won't matter if krcud is RT because we won't start using it).

> Andrea

I think we can avoid keventd altogether by using a periodic timer (say 10ms)
to check for completion of an RC update. The timer may be active
only if only if there is any RCU going on in the system - that way
we still don't have any impact on the rest of the kernel.

I am working on such a thing - but it will take me a little bit
of time to figure out how to do this in linux.

Thanks
Dipankar
--
Dipankar Sarma <dipankar@in.ibm.com> Project: http://lse.sourceforge.net
Linux Technology Center, IBM Software Lab, Bangalore, India.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:03    [W:0.045 / U:9.360 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site