Messages in this thread |  | | Date | Mon, 10 Sep 2001 23:29:44 +0200 (CEST) | From | Arjan Filius <> | Subject | Re: Feedback on preemptible kernel patch |
| |
Hello,
On 10 Sep 2001, Robert Love wrote:
> On Sun, 2001-09-09 at 23:24, Daniel Phillips wrote: > > This may not be your fault. It's a GFP_NOFS recursive allocation - this > > comes either from grow_buffers or ReiserFS, probably the former. In > > either case, it means we ran completely out of free pages, even though > > the caller is willing to wait. Hmm. It smells like a loophole in vm > > scanning. > > I am not a VM hacker -- can you tell me where to start? what do you > suspect it is? > > If the user stops seeing the error with preemption disabled, is your > theory nulled, or does that just mean the problem is agitated by > preemption? > > I don't think Arjan was using ReiserFS, so its from grow_buffers...
Yes I am using reiserfs (for "ages"). better said, reiser on LVM.
Small discription of my system and used setup: scsi-disk,scsi-cdrom,ide-disk,ide-scsi,ext2,reiser, iptables, ipv6, acenic-Gbit-ethernet, ramdisk, highmem (1.5GB-ram), Athlon 1.1GHz, Asus a7v MB (via).
Greatings,
> > I appreciate your help. > >
-- Arjan Filius mailto:iafilius@xs4all.nl
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
|  |