Messages in this thread |  | | Date | Sun, 9 Sep 2001 12:48:29 +0100 (BST) | From | Ken Moffat <> | Subject | Re: 2.4.10-pre5 (and gcc-3) |
| |
On Sat, 8 Sep 2001, Josh McKinney wrote:
> Since I have gotten a decent amount of flame mail from my one-liner posted > yesterday, I am just curious. Has anyone really been able to successfully > compile their kernel with gcc-3*. I did once or twice long before it was > released, but it dies on the same error everytime.
I had problems with pre-release versions, but gcc-3.0 works fine for me. I've got two boxes with K6s, this one running 2.4.6 (gcc-3) and the other was running various fairly recent kernels through to 2.4.8-pre3 compiled with gcc-3. I've seen strange errors with 2.4.7-ac5 (messages about loss of clock data, and trying to compile gcc-2.95.3 gave sig 11), but I'm not ready to lay those at the compiler's door. (The test box has turned into a linux from scratch system using gcc-2.95.3, it will be a little while before I get gcc-3 back up on it).
Ken -- If a six turned out to be nine, I don't mind.
Home page : http://www.kenmoffat.uklinux.net
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
|  |