Messages in this thread | | | Date | Tue, 28 Aug 2001 21:29:38 -0700 (PDT) | From | Andre Hedrick <> |
| |
That is the prefered location; however, setting/writing up hold over code that will be deleted in 2.5 is silly. The basics are the non-data taskfile registers operations.
Thoughts of accepting patches early for taskfile now?
Andre Hedrick CTO ASL, Inc. Linux ATA Development ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- ASL, Inc. Tel: (510) 857-0055 x103 38875 Cherry Street Fax: (510) 857-0010 Newark, CA 94560 Web: www.aslab.com
On Sun, 26 Aug 2001, Alan Cox wrote:
> > The problem is that the requirements of ACPI is to have a > > My PC110 does the same as Ross' machine, and like this box it has no ACPI. > This isnt an ACPI problem on the boxes I've seen do it. > > > You can attempt the noisy reset additions to some versions of hdparm, and > > then issuing the the checkpower commands until staus is reported as ready, > > Any reason you cant do that in kernel space, if an app can do it then > pm thread code can do it ... > > Alan >
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |