[lkml]   [2001]   [Aug]   [24]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [IDEA+RFC] Possible solution for min()/max() war

On Fri, 24 Aug 2001, Brad Chapman wrote:

> > >
> > > What do you think, sir?
> >
> > Use different inline functions for signed and unsigned.
> > Explicitly.
> OK. That sounds reasonable, but do we want to do another forced
> change, or do we want to hide it? That seems to be the root of the problem:
> keeping the same API but making it work _right_.

Existing API is wrong. "Hiding" is precisely what's wrong here - we
use the same name for two subtly different functions.

To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 12:58    [W:0.068 / U:2.372 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site