[lkml]   [2001]   [Aug]   [24]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [IDEA+RFC] Possible solution for min()/max() war
--- Tobias Diedrich <> wrote:
> Brad Chapman wrote:
> > This way, some hackers can use the two-arg min()/max() inside an #ifdef block,
> > other hackers can use the three-arg min()/max() inside an #ifdef block,
> > and people who don't care can select either.
> Umm, you know this means some drivers will work only with one setting, unless
> you always code both versions, which would be stupid ?
> --
> Tobias PGP-Key: 0x9AC7E0BC

Mr. Diedrich,

Yes, I'm aware of that. That's why we should try to centralize the #ifdef
somewhere, so that everybody sees a unified interface, but at the same time,
do this correctly _and_ _without_ the use of typeof().

BTW what is your opinion on the things I suggested?


Brad Chapman

Permanent e-mail:
Current e-mail:
Alternate e-mail:

Do You Yahoo!?
Make international calls for as low as $.04/minute with Yahoo! Messenger
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 12:58    [W:0.080 / U:0.092 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site