[lkml]   [2001]   [Aug]   [23]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [FAQ?] More ram=less performance (maximum cacheable RAM)
Luca Montecchiani writes:
> Robert Love wrote:
> >
> > It also has nothing to do with Linux. Some motherboard's TAG RAM do not
> > allow for caching more than xMB.
> I'm just proposing to update the FAQ to help people like me
> that thinking to gain speed doubling the system ram have seen
> a severe performance drop for certain task like compiling the
> kernel .
> Answer :
> It has nothing to do with Linux, maybe your motherboard's TAG Ram
> do not allow for caching more than xMB.

It's a useful entry, but I don't think it really belongs in the
linux-kernel mailing list FAQ. It belongs in some other
hardware-related document. Better to search for an appropriate one,
and get that updated as needed. I'm happy to add a link to it, though.

I just don't want the LKML FAQ turning into a bloated monster that
tries to answer all questions. The WWW is a *web*, not a central
repository, and works best if we keep it a web. Links Are Good[tm].

While I'm flattered you consider me (or at least the LKML FAQ) the
fount of all knowledge, I really would feel better if others shared in
the burden^Wglory.


To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 12:58    [W:0.106 / U:0.752 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site