[lkml]   [2001]   [Aug]   [23]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: Will 2.6 require Python for any configuration ? (CML2)
On Thu, 23 Aug 2001 15:31:26 -0400, Disconnect <>

>On Thu, 23 Aug 2001, Rik van Riel did have cause to say:
>> On Thu, 23 Aug 2001, Disconnect wrote:
>> > ONLY task that they will use python for. And everyone who builds a kernel
>> > will have gcc, so thats the 'ideal' dependency. Second and third most
>> > likely, a C++ compiler or perl (depending on what you figure the
>> > installbase of each one is). Forth, some form of java runtime. And after
>> > that is python.
>> Sounds like you'd just might be fanatical enough to implement
>> CML2 in C or Perl, then ;)
>> Personally, I'd welcome such a thing...
>You are mistaking my position I think. Personally, I like python quite a
>bit ;)
>But my point isn't that its good/bad for CML2. My point is that I would
>be very surprised if you had to install python in order to configure and
>build a kernel under CML2, once CML2 is the official configuration
>platform. (Right now it is necessary to have python to use cml2. But
>CML2 is not yet in the stock kernel sources.)
>But until ESR either chimes in or releases the final CML2, this is a moot

ESR is awaiting the 2.5 branch and the makefile rewrite.

My impression is that CML2 is "less bad" than CML in terms of weird
languages and buggy interpreters.

To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 12:58    [W:0.126 / U:0.236 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site