lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2001]   [Aug]   [23]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
SubjectRe: macro conflict
Date
From
> The problem here with AFS is that it needs the old definition but the old
> definition is being over written by the new one... you guys should know
> all this. But I am just saying that I really think the new macro
> min(type,x,y) should get a new name. like type_min or something.

Yep. Thats one of the reasons I've not yet moved to 2.4.9 derived trees
for -ac. Its going to require I schedule some time to fix up every single
bogus min/max change in Linus tree
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 12:58    [W:0.097 / U:0.044 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site