[lkml]   [2001]   [Aug]   [21]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: kernel threads
On Friday 17 August 2001 00:37, you wrote:
> > schedule the call to kernel_thread using tq_schedule
> You still want to use daemonzie
> > - is there no need to call daemonize in the second variant - if yes why?
> A task always has a parent, it'll just be a random task that ran the
> kernel_thread request - in fact it might be a kernel thread and then
> I dont guarantee what will occur. In fact I wouldnt try the tq_schedule one

sorry i didn't say that i what to use 2.4.x
when looking to kernel/context.c there it says that (or better i looks to me
like it sais) that all that is sheduled to tq_schedule runns under keventd. so
the parent is predicable and is demonised itsself. is that bad or good?

To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 12:57    [W:0.035 / U:2.156 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site