Messages in this thread | | | Subject | Re: Linux 2.4.8-ac8 | Date | Tue, 21 Aug 2001 00:22:37 -0700 (PDT) | From | (Colonel) |
| |
In clouddancer.list.kernel, you wrote: > >I think is fair to say that alan's tree tracks linus' rather than sync's >with it... > >it's also observable that there are a few things (from the mailing list >traffic at least) in .9 that's perhaps shouldn't be merged into ac until >linus has returned from vaction an examined the submitted patches/twiddled >with it a bit himself... > >joelja
I hope it stays that way for awhile. I get much better performance (subjective, don't know how to benchmark ~2-3x virtual desktop switching) than with any recent linus kernel. Even playing with a little 500M SQL database doesn't hinder the system anymore.
Thanks!
>On Mon, 20 Aug 2001, Thiago Vinhas de Moraes wrote: > >> >> Alan, >> >> I'm sorry if it was previously answered, but why your tree is currently not >> in sync with Linus's tree? >> >> Regards, >> Thiago
-- Windows 2001: "I'm sorry Dave ... I'm afraid I can't do that."
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |