[lkml]   [2001]   [Aug]   [20]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: /dev/random in 2.4.6
    Doug McNaught wrote:
    > Chris Friesen <> writes:
    > > Why don't we also switch to a cryptographically secure algorithm for
    > > /dev/urandom?
    > It IS cryptographically secure. Have you ever read the manpage?

    Oops, my bad. I got errors doing man on urandom, but neglected to try a man on

    The main reason for my comment was the suggestion by Steve Hill that
    /dev/urandom was NOT cryptographically secure. Re-reading it, his comment was
    in the context of generating cryptographic keys, so perhaps I misunderstood what
    he meant.


    Chris Friesen | MailStop: 043/33/F10
    Nortel Networks | work: (613) 765-0557
    3500 Carling Avenue | fax: (613) 765-2986
    Nepean, ON K2H 8E9 Canada | email:
    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to
    More majordomo info at
    Please read the FAQ at

     \ /
      Last update: 2005-03-22 12:57    [W:0.021 / U:14.708 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site