[lkml]   [2001]   [Aug]   [17]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: linux-2.4.9: atomic_dec_and_lock sometimes used while not defined
>>>>> " " == Adam J Richter <> writes:

> If I try to build a kernel that can do SMP and run on a 386,
> the linux-2.4.9 NFS client gets compiled with an undefined
> reference to atomic_dec_and_lock().

Why aren't you seeing the same error in linux/fs/inode.c? That also
references atomic_dec_and_lock when compiling 386 SMP...

> However, I'm really not clear enough on the semantics of
> atomic_dec_and_lock vs. atomic_dec_and_test to know whether
> this is safe.

> Also, it looks like arch/sparc64/sparc64_ksyms.c references
> atomic_dec_and_test without it every being defined on any
> architecture other than x86, so I am suspicious of a partially
> applied patch here.

See linux/arch/sparc64/lib/dec_and_lock.S. atomic_dec_and_lock should
indeed be defined on a sparc64.

To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 12:57    [W:0.047 / U:0.024 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site