[lkml]   [2001]   [Aug]   [17]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [PATCH] processes with shared vm
On 17 Aug 2001 10:21:35 +0200, Andi Kleen wrote:
> The basic idea is a good one (I have written a similar thing in the past ;)
> Your implementation is O(n^2) however in ps, which is not acceptable.
> <snip>

Is there any reason your patch was not accepted? Perhaps for 2.5?

This is something (along with userspace changes to take advtantage of
it) that I think is really needed -- no more bogus ps/top reports.

I liked Terje's idea, but obviously the scalability needs to be improved
(I didn't even notice it, sadly). I would really want to see this at
some point.

Robert M. Love
rml at
rml at

To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 12:57    [W:0.097 / U:0.124 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site