[lkml]   [2001]   [Aug]   [14]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
Subject3c905b works with 10bt hub - not with 10/100 switch
I've been having major problems on my network as of today.

For the purpose of this explaination, there are two machines: the
Server and the Client.

The Server has the following network card setup:

3c59x.c:LK1.1.13 27 Jan 2001 Donald Becker and others.
See Documentation/networking/vortex.txt
eth0: 3Com PCI 3c590 Vortex 10Mbps at 0xd800, <6>eth0: Overriding PCI latency timer (CFLT) setting of 32, new value is 248.
00:20:af:f8:2d:c4, IRQ 11
product code 4244 rev 00.0 date 11-06-95
32K byte-wide RAM 1:1 Rx:Tx split, autoselect/10baseT interface.
eth0: scatter/gather disabled. h/w checksums disabled
PCI: Found IRQ 11 for device 00:0a.0
IRQ routing conflict in pirq table for device 00:0a.0
eth1: 3Com PCI 3c905 Boomerang 100baseTx at 0xdc00, 00:60:97:31:d9:bd, IRQ 10
product code 4848 rev 00.0 date 11-04-96
8K word-wide RAM 3:5 Rx:Tx split, autoselect/MII interface.
MII transceiver found at address 24, status 782d.
Enabling bus-master transmits and whole-frame receives.
eth1: scatter/gather enabled. h/w checksums disabled
PCI: Found IRQ 10 for device 00:0b.0
IRQ routing conflict in pirq table for device 00:0b.0
eth2: 3Com PCI 3c905B Cyclone 100baseTx at 0xe000, 00:10:4b:79:46:76, IRQ 12
product code 4e4b rev 00.9 date 04-17-98
8K byte-wide RAM 5:3 Rx:Tx split, autoselect/Autonegotiate interface.
MII transceiver found at address 24, status 786d.
Enabling bus-master transmits and whole-frame receives.
eth2: scatter/gather enabled. h/w checksums enabled

The card we are interested in is eth2. It is what connects the server
to the segment of the network which I will describe. The server is
running 2.4.4.

On the client, we have this simpler ethernet configuration:

PCI: Found IRQ 9 for device 00:0f.0
PCI: Sharing IRQ 9 with 00:03.0
3c59x: Donald Becker and others.
00:0f.0: 3Com PCI 3c905 Boomerang 100baseTx at 0xcc00. Vers LK1.1.16

The Client is running 2.4.8-ac2.

This morning, the connection between these two machines (and a few
others which were idle or powered down) was a very simple 5 port 10
base T hub. This makes NFS pretty miserable, which is why I installed
a CentreCOM FS704 Fast Ethernet switch in place of the hub today. At
first, it worked great. The machines negotiated full duplex and were
on the network. I was able to get expected speeds out of the network.

In the late afternoon, I was not at home, but ssh'd into Server. I was
rather shocked that I could not ping Client. When I got home, the
first thing I did was investigate this further. When either machine
tried to ping the other, the correct lights on the hub blinked, but no
packages were recieved. Shortly after this experimentation, Client
started complaining about invalid arguments whenever I tried to su and
proceeded to lock up pretty hard. "Oh well," I thought, "It's was in a
bad state, but after a reboot it should work." Wrong. After a reboot, the
pings were still not able to reach each other. Substituting back the
old slow hub caused things to work perfectly again.

I decided to try forcing a particular mode of duplex. After compiling
the driver as a module, I tried insmoding it with full_duplex=0 and
full_duplex=1. This caused even more problems, yielding Tx timeout
errors on one of them and not working with the other, even with the
hub. Just then, my scsi0 card tried to reset the scsi bus for no
apparent reason and locked up the system. I thought to myself "Ah hah,
Client's 3c905 is sharing an IRQ with scsi1 (NOT scsi0, i had two
different cards)." To make things simple, I removed scsi1 from the
system. However, even this didn't help! Now my 3c905 is sharing an IRQ
with my emu10k1, and it still works fine with the hub but not with the
switch (BTW: I went back to a compiled-in driver at this point).

This is really, really weird. I'm pretty sure the switch is okay
because I have two units, and each does the same thing. The odd thing
is the switch was working fine this morning, when I just installed it.

I would like to have tried a crossover cable between Client and
Server, but they're over 100 feet apart and I don't have a crossover
cable that long, nor do I have a double female adaptor that would
allow me to tack on a crossover cable handy (!@#$ it must be around
her somewhere!).

Anyway, I'm hoping somebody can shed light on what's going on from the
perspective of the driver.

P.S. I JUST realized that I nearly trashed a 100base T hub for
displaying essensially the exact behavior as I saw in the switches!
And similarly, it worked at first and then never worked again,
although the hub worked for a few months instead of the partial day of
the switch. And this must have been 6 months to a year ago! Perhaps
the card in Server or Client is having trouble running correctly at

I'd be happy to perform more tests. I'd even give out network access
as necessary. I just don't want to be stuck at 10mbits!

Uh oh, I'm finding data as I write this post. Well, I hope that's
alright. At least, I hope nobody minds this weird style.

Anyway, I just brought another machine onto the network. For the sake
of neutrality, it was an old mac 68k with MacTCP. It only does
10megabits, but I don't think that matters -- I'm just trying to
figure out whether Server or Client's ethernet is dying once on a
100mbit network.

And the answer is... Server's! Client can ping Mac on the switch,
Server can't. So, looks like there are some problems with eth2 in
Server. That's odd. I'm not getting any interesting messages. At most,
I'm getting

eth2: Setting full-duplex based on MII #24 link partner capability of 41e1.

when plugging into the switch


eth2: Setting half-duplex based on MII #24 link partner capability of 4021.

when connecting to the hub.

So, I suppose this boils down to: is this a driver bug for the 905B
(eth2 is the only Cyclone I have), or is the card defective? I'll do
what I can to debug, and try to cooperate with the driver developers,
but I think I have some eepro cards that are kind of tempting to pop
in and try.

Good luck,
Aaron Lehmann
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 12:57    [W:0.055 / U:0.240 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site