[lkml]   [2001]   [Aug]   [14]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: Are we going too fast?
On Monday 13 August 2001 07:24 pm, David Ford wrote:
> PinkFreud wrote:
> >I wasn't aware VIA nor Matrox were broken. I've seen someone else
> > mention in this thread that perhaps some old HOWTOs on hardware need
> > to be maintained again - I think I agree with that.
> VIA comes up as a bloody thorn quite often it seems. I have a VIA 586B
> system and it seems to work decently but I think I'm just lucky
> considering the large number of broken VIA chipset complaints.
> >Perhaps series name should be changed from 'stable' to something else
> > - 'release'?
> Erm...they are called release. 2.<even> is a release kernel and
> 2.<odd> is a development kernel. Some people (myself included) fight
> the impression given by a lot of people of stable/unstable naming.
> Typically called slashdotters...</humor>

If this is truely the case, I'd suggest that be modified, as
it refers to them as *stable*
as of 9:18PM PDT, direct copy & paste from page:

The latest stable version of the Linux kernel is: 2.4.8 2001-08-11 04:13
UTC Changelog

The latest prepatch (alpha) version appears to be: 2.4.9-pre3 2001-08-13
23:56 UTC Changelog
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 12:57    [W:0.191 / U:0.132 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site