[lkml]   [2001]   [Jul]   [9]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: VM in 2.4.7-pre hurts...
On Sun, 8 Jul 2001, Rik van Riel wrote:

> On Sun, 8 Jul 2001, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> > On Sun, 8 Jul 2001, Rik van Riel wrote:
> > >
> > > ... Bingo. You hit the infamous __wait_on_buffer / ___wait_on_page
> > > bug. I've seen this for quite a while now on our quad xeon test
> > > machine, with some kernel versions it can be reproduced in minutes,
> > > with others it won't trigger at all.
> >
> > Hmm.. That would explain why the "tar" gets stuck, but why does the whole
> > machine grind to a halt with all other processes being marked runnable?
> If __wait_on_buffer and ___wait_on_page get stuck, this could
> mean a page doesn't get unlocked. When this is happening, we
> may well be running into a dozens of pages which aren't getting
> properly unlocked on IO completion.
> This in turn would get the rest of the system stuck in the
> pageout code path, eating CPU like crazy.

I don't know exactly what is happening, but I do know _who_ is causing
the problem I'm seeing.. it's tmpfs. When mounted on /tmp and running
X/KDE, the tar [1] will oom my box every time because page_launder trys
and always failing to get anything scrubbed after the tar has run for a
while. Unmount tmpfs/restart X and do the same tar, and all is well.

(it's not locked pages aparantly. I modified page_launder to move those
to the active list, and refill_inactive_scan to rotate them to the end
of the active list. inactive_dirty list still grows ever larger, filling
with 'stuff' that page_launder can't clean until you're totally oom)


To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 12:56    [W:0.238 / U:0.832 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site