[lkml]   [2001]   [Jul]   [8]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [Acpi] Re: ACPI fundamental locking problems

On Sat, 7 Jul 2001, Jamie Lokier wrote:

> Daniel Phillips wrote:
> > > Reading a tarball is the distillation of what you describe into
> > > efficient form :)
> >
> > /me downloads tar file definition
> >
> > Um, gnu tar or posix tar? or some new, improved tar?
> I suggest cpio, which is more compact and in some ways more standard.
> (tar has a silly pad-to-multiple-of-512-byte per file rule, which is
> inappropriate for this). GNU cpio creates cpio format just fine.

GNU cpio is a race-ridden unmaintained pile of junk. Look at the size
of, say it, Debian patch to upstream source. Then try to read the
patched code. Quite a few of us simply don't have that FPOS on their

Using cpio archive layout is OK, but _please_, don't make it dependent
on GNU cpio.

To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 12:56    [W:0.080 / U:2.668 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site