[lkml]   [2001]   [Jul]   [7]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: [Acpi] Re: ACPI fundamental locking problems
    In article <>,
    Alexander Viro <> writes:

    >> Doesn't the approach "treat a chunk of data built into bzImage as
    >> populated ramfs" look cleaner? No need to fiddle with tar format,
    >> no copying data from place to place.
    > What the hell _is_ "populated ramfs"? The thing doesn't live in array
    > of blocks. Its directory structure consists of a bunch of dentries.

    I am stupid. But the point still stays: having an image of pre-populated
    filesystem (some other than ramfs) that you only need to load into
    RAM seems more sutable than parsing tar format. Maybe (probably) I am
    missing something.

    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to
    More majordomo info at
    Please read the FAQ at

     \ /
      Last update: 2005-03-22 12:56    [W:10.303 / U:0.004 seconds]
    ©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site