lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2001]   [Jul]   [7]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
    /
    From
    SubjectRe: [Acpi] Re: ACPI fundamental locking problems
    Date
    In article <Pine.GSO.4.21.0107070727030.24836-100000@weyl.math.psu.edu>,
    Alexander Viro <viro@math.psu.edu> writes:

    >> Doesn't the approach "treat a chunk of data built into bzImage as
    >> populated ramfs" look cleaner? No need to fiddle with tar format,
    >> no copying data from place to place.
    >
    > What the hell _is_ "populated ramfs"? The thing doesn't live in array
    > of blocks. Its directory structure consists of a bunch of dentries.

    I am stupid. But the point still stays: having an image of pre-populated
    filesystem (some other than ramfs) that you only need to load into
    RAM seems more sutable than parsing tar format. Maybe (probably) I am
    missing something.

    Eugene
    -
    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
    More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
    Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

    \
     
     \ /
      Last update: 2005-03-22 12:56    [W:10.303 / U:0.004 seconds]
    ©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site