Messages in this thread Patch in this message | | | Date | Sat, 7 Jul 2001 10:16:57 +0100 | From | Russell King <> | Subject | 2.4.6 PCMCIA NET modular build breakage |
| |
Seems like its something that appeared between 2.4.5 and 2.4.6. Anyone know the correct fix, other than reversing the change?
----- Forwarded message from Nicolas Pitre <nico@cam.org> ----- ---------- Forwarded message ---------- Date: Fri, 6 Jul 2001 12:17:54 +0400 From: Oleg Drokin <green@iXcelerator.com> To: nico@CAM.ORG Subject: 2.4.6-rmk1-np1 breakage
Hello!
these sevaral bits from latest patch do not allow kernel to build when PCMCIA netcard is selected, but all if the cards are selected as modules
diff -uNr linux-2.4.5-rmk7-np1/drivers/net/pcmcia/Config.in linux-2.4.6-rmk1-np1/drivers/net/pcmcia/Config.in --- linux-2.4.5-rmk7-np1/drivers/net/pcmcia/Config.in Mon May 28 10:21:00 2001 +++ linux-2.4.6-rmk1-np1/drivers/net/pcmcia/Config.in Wed Jul 4 10:47:46 2001@@ -32,13 +32,4 @@ fi fi
-if [ "$CONFIG_PCMCIA_3C589" = "y" -o "$CONFIG_PCMCIA_3C574" = "y" -o \ - "$CONFIG_PCMCIA_FMVJ18X" = "y" -o "$CONFIG_PCMCIA_PCNET" = "y" -o \ - "$CONFIG_PCMCIA_NMCLAN" = "y" -o "$CONFIG_PCMCIA_SMC91C92" = "y" -o \ - "$CONFIG_PCMCIA_XIRC2PS" = "y" -o "$CONFIG_PCMCIA_RAYCS" = "y" -o \ - "$CONFIG_PCMCIA_NETWAVE" = "y" -o "$CONFIG_PCMCIA_WAVELAN" = "y" -o \ - "$CONFIG_PCMCIA_XIRTULIP" = "y" ]; then - define_bool CONFIG_PCMCIA_NETCARD y -fi
And this bit for top level Makefile
-DRIVERS-$(CONFIG_PCMCIA_NETCARD) += drivers/net/pcmcia/pcmcia_net.o +DRIVERS-$(CONFIG_NET_PCMCIA) += drivers/net/pcmcia/pcmcia_net.o Since all net cards are modules, object list for pcmcia_net.o is empty and kernel can't be linked.
Bye, Oleg
----- End forwarded message ----- -- Russell King (rmk@arm.linux.org.uk) The developer of ARM Linux http://www.arm.linux.org.uk/personal/aboutme.html
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |