[lkml]   [2001]   [Jul]   [7]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: [Acpi] Re: ACPI fundamental locking problems

    On 7 Jul 2001, Eugene Crosser wrote:

    > Doesn't the approach "treat a chunk of data built into bzImage as
    > populated ramfs" look cleaner? No need to fiddle with tar format,
    > no copying data from place to place.

    What the hell _is_ "populated ramfs"? The thing doesn't live in array
    of blocks. Its directory structure consists of a bunch of dentries.
    Permissions/ownership/timestamps are in a bunch of struct inode -
    sitting in icache and allocated in normal way. Regular files are
    entirely in pagecache, ditto for symlinks.

    Ramfs has no backing store. At all. That's precisely what remains of
    filesystem if you take backing store away - everything is in VFS/VM caches.

    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to
    More majordomo info at
    Please read the FAQ at

     \ /
      Last update: 2005-03-22 13:17    [W:0.019 / U:5.972 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site