[lkml]   [2001]   [Jul]   [6]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
On Fri, 6 Jul 2001, David S. Miller wrote:

> What about for drivers of SAC-only devices, they eat the overhead
> when highmem is enabled too?

Yes. It's not an unreasonable overhead considering that it's configured
out for all the non-highmem kernels that will be shipped. Keep in mind
that the expected lifespan for 32 bit systems is now less than 3 years, so
elaborate planning that delays implementation buys us nothing more than a
smaller window of usefulness.

> This says nothing about the real reason the IA64 solution is
> unacceptable, the inputs to the mapping functions which must
> be "page+offset+len" triplets as there is no logical "virtual
> address" to pass into the mapping routines on 32-bit systems.

On x86 a 64 bit DMA address cookie is fine. If you've got concerns, tell
us what you have in mind for a design.

> Face it, the ia64 stuff is not what we can use across the board. It
> simply doesn't deal with all the necessary issues. Therefore,
> encouraging driver author's to use this ia64 hacked up scheme is
> not such a hot idea until we have a real API implemented.

So what's the API?


To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 12:56    [W:0.075 / U:2.144 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site