Messages in this thread | | | Subject | Re: linux/macros.h(new) and linux/list.h(mod) ... | Date | Thu, 05 Jul 2001 18:20:54 -0400 | From | Hua Zhong <> |
| |
-> From David Woodhouse <dwmw2@infradead.org> : > > huaz@cs.columbia.edu said: > > Doesn't it add more overhead? I think using inline functions are > > much better. > > Why should it add overhead? Even the most naïve compiler ought to generate > the same code, surely? I must admit I haven't looked hard at the output - > it didn't even occur to me that it might produce suboptimal code.
right, gcc -O2 does produce the same code (but -O does not).
> > > Yes you have to define it for different types (char, short, int, > > long, signed/unsigned). > > Unfortunately, this being C means that you can't call them all by the same > name. If I have to use unsigned_long_max(x,y) I'd rather type it out myself > :)
Oops, I must be sleeping at that time :-)
> -- > dwmw2 > >
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |