Messages in this thread |  | | Date | Thu, 05 Jul 2001 15:06:24 -0700 (PDT) | From | Davide Libenzi <> | Subject | Re: linux/macros.h(new) and linux/list.h(mod) ... |
| |
On 05-Jul-2001 Hua Zhong wrote: > > Doesn't it add more overhead? I think using inline functions are much > better. > Yes you have to define it for different types (char, short, int, long, > signed/unsigned).
Yes it does. Personally I know that min, max, etc... are macros and I never use unary operators inside. Maybe a "unsafe" __max() and a "safe" max() could coexist.
- Davide
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
|  |