Messages in this thread |  | | Date | Thu, 5 Jul 2001 08:37:29 +0200 | From | Ragnar Hojland Espinosa <> | Subject | Re: >128 MB RAM stability problems (again) |
| |
On Wed, Jul 04, 2001 at 11:16:43PM -0400, Bill Pringlemeir wrote: > I also have had problems with a machine that had 128Mb + 64 Mb. I > discovered the following about 2.4.x. You _should_ have a swap file > that is double RAM. Mixing different SDRAM types is probably a bad > thing. So if you upgraded, then that might be problematic.
And here's a counter claim: At home have 128 + 64, both of different speeds and brands. Of course, to run properly you have to force the pc100 to run at 66, but other than that they're happy (96MB swap)
-- ____/| Ragnar Højland Freedom - Linux - OpenGL | Brainbench MVP \ o.O| PGP94C4B2F0D27DE025BE2302C104B78C56 B72F0822 | for Unix Programming =(_)= "Thou shalt not follow the NULL pointer for | (www.brainbench.com) U chaos and madness await thee at its end." - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
|  |