lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2001]   [Jul]   [3]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
From
SubjectRe: RFC: modules and 2.5
Date

>
> A couple things that would be nice for 2.5 is
> - let MOD_INC_USE_COUNT work even when module is built into kernel, and
> - let THIS_MODULE exist and be valid even when module is built into
> kernel
>
> This introduces bloat into the static kernel for modules which do not
> take advantage of this, so perhaps we can make this new behavior
> conditional on CONFIG_xxx option. Individual drivers which make use of
> the behavior can do something like
>
> dep_tristate 'my driver' CONFIG_MYDRIVER $CONFIG_PCI
> if [ "$CONFIG_MYDRIVER" != "n" -a \
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
> "$CONFIG_STATIC_MODULES" != "y" ]; then
> define_bool CONFIG_STATIC_MODULES y
> fi

Hmmm, shouldn't it be written in CML2 if it is for 2.5 ?

For 2.4 the marked condition ( != n on a variable defined by dep_*)
probably would break xconfig. Don't suggest such solutions...

Andrzej
--
=======================================================================
Andrzej M. Krzysztofowicz ankry@mif.pg.gda.pl
tel. (0-58) 347 14 61
Wydz.Fizyki Technicznej i Matematyki Stosowanej Politechniki Gdanskiej
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 12:56    [W:0.043 / U:0.248 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site