[lkml]   [2001]   [Jul]   [2]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [PATCH] Re: 2.4.6p6: dep_{bool,tristate} $CONFIG_ARCH_xxx bugs

Copping out with "not my job" and then demanding essentially a
mathematical proof of correctness is unpersuasive, but I have no
objection to your change (some select "define_bool xxx no" lines in
a common file that every architecture reads), as long as we have
established that it seems to get along with "make xconfig" after all.
If that is the case, then I'd be just as happy that Linus apply your patch.

So, with that lame endorsement and nobody else still objecting
to your patch (right?), how about if you submit your patch to Linus,
or is there some other way you want to proceed?

Adam J. Richter __ ______________ 4880 Stevens Creek Blvd, Suite 104 \ / San Jose, California 95129-1034
+1 408 261-6630 | g g d r a s i l United States of America
fax +1 408 261-6631 "Free Software For The Rest Of Us."
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 12:55    [W:0.052 / U:0.460 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site