Messages in this thread | | | Date | Wed, 18 Jul 2001 02:02:33 +0400 | From | Hans Reiser <> | Subject | Re: NFS Client patch |
| |
Andi Kleen wrote: > > Craig Soules <soules@happyplace.pdl.cmu.edu> writes: > > > Our system does automatic directory compaction through the use of a tree > > structure, and so the cookie needs to be invalidated. Also, any other > > file system whicih does immediate directory compaction would require this. > > Actually all the file systems who do that on Linux (JFS, XFS, reiserfs) > have fixed the issue properly server side, by adding a layer that generates > stable cookies. You should too. > > -Andi > > - > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in > the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html > Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
I take issue with the word "properly". We have bastardized our FS design to do it. NFS should not be allowed to impose stable cookie maintenance on filesystems, it violates layering. Simply returning the last returned filename is so simple to code, much simpler than what we have to do to cope with cookies. Linux should fix the protocol for NFS, not ask Craig to screw over his FS design. Not that I think that will happen.....
Hans - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |