[lkml]   [2001]   [Jul]   [16]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: CPU affinity & IPI latency
On Fri, Jul 13, 2001 at 11:25:21PM -0400, Hubertus Franke wrote:
> Mike, could we utilize the existing mechanism such as has_cpu.

I like it. Especially the way you eliminated the situation where
we would have multiple tasks waiting for schedule. Hope this is
not a frequent situation!!! The only thing I don't like is the
use of has_cpu to prevent the task from being scheduled. Right
now, I can't think of any problems with it. However, in the past
I have been bit by using fields for purposes other than what they
were designed for.

Mike Kravetz
IBM Linux Technology Center
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 12:57    [W:0.030 / U:0.072 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site