On Mon, 16 Jul 2001, Rik van Riel wrote:

> On Mon, 16 Jul 2001, Kanoj Sarcar wrote:
> 
> > Just a quick note. A per-zone page reclamation
> > method like this was what I had advocated and sent
> > patches to Linus for in the 2.3.43 time frame or so.
> > I think later performance work ripped out that work.
> 
> Yes, the system ended up swapping as soon as the first zone
> was filled up and after that would fill up the other zones;
> the way the system stabilised was cycling through the pages
> of one zone and leaving the lower zones alone.
> 
> This reduced the amount of available VM of a 1GB system
> to 128MB, which is somewhat suboptimal ;)
> 
> What we learned from that is that we need to have some
> way to auto-balance the reclaiming, keeping the objective
> of evicting the least used page from RAM in mind.
> 
> > I guess the problem is that a lot of the different
> > page reclamation schemes first of all do not know
> > how to reclaim pages for a specific zone,
> 
> > try_to_swap_out is a good example, which can be solved
> > by rmaps.
> 
> Indeed. Most of the time things go right, but the current
> system cannot cope at all when things go wrong. I think we
> really want things like rmaps and more sturdy reclaiming
> mechanisms to cope with these worst cases (and also to make
> the common case easier to get right).

As I said to Kanoj, I agree that we really want rmaps to fix that thing
right.

Now I don't see any other way for fixing that on _2.4_ except something
similar to the patch I posted. That patch can still have problems in
practice, but fundamentally _it is the right thing_, IMO.


-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/