[lkml]   [2001]   [Jul]   [15]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: Stability of ReiserFS onj Kernel 2.4.x (sp. 2.4.[56]{-ac*}
Daniel Phillips writes:

> Or we could introduce the notion of logical blocksize for each block
> minor so that we can measure blocks in the same units the filesystem
> uses. This would give us 16 TB while being able to stay with 32 bits
> everywhere outside the block drivers themselves.
> We are not that far away from being able to handle 8K blocks, so that
> would bump it up to 32 TB.

This is like what the hard drive and BIOS industry has been doing.
First we had the 528 MB limit. Then the 2 GB limit. Then the 4 GB limit.
Then the 8.3 GB limit. Then the 33 GB limit. Then the 127 GB limit.
All along the way, users are cursing the damn limits.

An extra 4 bits buys us 6 years maybe. Nice, except that we
already have people complaining. Maybe somebody remembers when
the complaining started.

To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 12:57    [W:0.244 / U:0.588 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site