Messages in this thread |  | | From | "Albert D. Cahalan" <> | | Subject | Re: Stability of ReiserFS onj Kernel 2.4.x (sp. 2.4.[56]{-ac*} | | Date | Sun, 15 Jul 2001 20:22:11 -0400 (EDT) |
| |
Daniel Phillips writes:
> Or we could introduce the notion of logical blocksize for each block > minor so that we can measure blocks in the same units the filesystem > uses. This would give us 16 TB while being able to stay with 32 bits > everywhere outside the block drivers themselves. > > We are not that far away from being able to handle 8K blocks, so that > would bump it up to 32 TB.
This is like what the hard drive and BIOS industry has been doing. First we had the 528 MB limit. Then the 2 GB limit. Then the 4 GB limit. Then the 8.3 GB limit. Then the 33 GB limit. Then the 127 GB limit. All along the way, users are cursing the damn limits.
An extra 4 bits buys us 6 years maybe. Nice, except that we already have people complaining. Maybe somebody remembers when the complaining started.
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
|  |