lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2001]   [Jul]   [15]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
From
SubjectRe: Stability of ReiserFS onj Kernel 2.4.x (sp. 2.4.[56]{-ac*}
Date

"Hans Reiser" <reiser@namesys.com> wrote in message
news:cistron.3B51C864.C98B61DE@namesys.com...
>
> The limits for reiserfs and ext2 for kernels 2.4.x are the same (and they
are 2Tb not 1Tb). The
> limits are not in the individual filesystems. We need to have Linux go to
64 bit blocknumbers in
> 2.5.x, I am seeing a lot of customer demand for it. (Or we could use
scalable integers, which would
> be better.)
>
> Hans
> -

It appears to be 1TB. Just last week I tried a 1.1TB fibre RAID array, and
found several signed/unsigned issues. Fdisk was unable to work with the
array. This on Slackware 8.0 distribution with 2.4.6 kernel.

Rob




-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 12:57    [W:0.178 / U:4.920 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site