[lkml]   [2001]   [Jul]   [15]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [PATCH] 64 bit scsi read/write
On Sunday 15 July 2001 15:16, Ken Hirsch wrote:
> Chris Wedgwood <> wrote:
> > On Sat, Jul 14, 2001 at 11:05:36PM -0700, John Alvord wrote:
> > >
> > > In the IBM solution to this (1977-78, VM/CMS) the critical data
> > > was written at the begining and the end of the block. If the two
> > > data items didn't match then the block was rejected.
> >
> > Neat.
> >
> > Simple and effective. Presumably you can also checksum the block,
> > and check that.
> The first technique is not sufficient with modern disk controllers,
> which may reorder sector writes within a block. A checksum,
> especially a robust CRC32, is sufficient, but rather expensive.

As somebody else pointed out, not if you don't have to compute it on
every block, as with journalling or atomic commit.

> Mohan has a clever technique that is computationally trivial and only
> uses one bit per sector:
> Unfortunately, it's also patented:

Fortunately, it's clunky and unappealing compared to the simple
checksum method, applied only to those blocks that define consistency
points. I don't think this is patented. I'd be disturbed if it was,
since it's obvious.

> Perhaps IBM will clarify their position with respect to free software
> and patents in the upcoming conference.

Wouldn't that be nice. Imagine, IBM comes out and says, we admit it,
patents are a net burden on everybody, even us - from now on, we use
them only against those who use them against us, and we'll put that
in writing. Right.

To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 12:57    [W:0.344 / U:0.608 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site