[lkml]   [2001]   [Jul]   [13]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: 2x Oracle slowdown from 2.2.16 to 2.4.4
On Fri, 13 Jul 2001, Andrew Morton wrote:

> Andrew Morton wrote:
> >
> > Lance Larsh wrote:
> > >
> > > And while we're talking about comparing configurations, I'll mention that
> > > I'm currently trying to compare raw and ext2 (no lvm in either case).
> >
> > It would be interesting to see some numbers for ext3 with full
> > data journalling.
> >
> > Some preliminary testing by Neil Brown shows that ext3 is 1.5x faster
> > than ext2 when used with knfsd, mounted synchronously. (This uses
> > O_SYNC internally).
> I just did some testing with local filesystems - running `dbench 4'
> on ext2-on-iDE and ext3-on-IDE, where dbench was altered to open
> files O_SYNC. Journal size was 400 megs, mount options `data=journal'
> ext2: Throughput 2.71849 MB/sec (NB=3.39812 MB/sec 27.1849 MBit/sec)
> ext3: Throughput 12.3623 MB/sec (NB=15.4529 MB/sec 123.623 MBit/sec)
> ext3 patches are at
> The difference will be less dramatic with large, individual writes.

This is a totally transient effect, right? The journal acts as a faster
buffer, but if programs are writing a lot of data to the disk for a very
long time, the throughput will eventually be throttled by writing the
journal back into the filesystem.

For programs that write in bursts, it looks like a huge win!


To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 12:57    [W:0.069 / U:0.992 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site