Messages in this thread | | | Date | 12 Jul 2001 08:58:00 +0200 | From | (Kai Henningsen) |
| |
davej@suse.de (Dave Jones) wrote on 11.07.01 in <Pine.LNX.4.30.0107111858110.1811-100000@Appserv.suse.de>:
> Given the PR disaster that the P3 serial number brought about, > I'd be surprised if Intel were to revisit that chapter of history :)
Though much of that has been bad PR handling, I think. It's not as if Intel invented that feature - for example, every s390 system has one (and so did the whole family at least since the /370, used for licenses, for example), and everything living on ethernet is supposed to have a unique MAC address. (Which *has* already been used in tracing authors of malicious Windows software, I believe.)
OTOH, ISTR that under VM, it's possible to simulate the /370 etc. cpuid of someone else. Which I know has been used to circumvent license restrictions.
Then again, the US custom of using the SSN as a generic index would be rather illegal over here, so that might change peoples attitudes to the mere existance of those numbers - it does make a difference how big a stick you can wield.
Not that any of this is important to Linux ...
MfG Kai - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |