lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2001]   [Jul]   [11]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: io_request_lock patch?
On Tue, Jul 10 2001, Mike Anderson wrote:
> The call to do_aic7xxx_isr appears that you are running the aic7xxx_old.c
> code. This driver is using the io_request_lock to protect internal data.
> The newer aic driver has its own lock. This is related to previous
> comments by Jens and Eric about lower level use of this lock.

Yes

> I would like to know why the request_freelist is going empty? Having

Well, it's a limited resource so it's bound to go empty when under load.
In fact, if you have plenty of RAM this is what will end up starting I/O
on the queued buffers. With the batch freeing of request slots, this is
ok.

> __get_request_wait being called alot would appear to be not optimal.

?? Care to explain your reasoning behind this statement.

--
Jens Axboe

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 12:56    [W:0.059 / U:0.572 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site