lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2001]   [Jul]   [11]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
From
Date
>>>>> "David" == David S Miller <davem@redhat.com> writes:

David> Alan Cox writes:
>> I see no good way to optimise for 64bit dma on a 32bit box.

David> I'm actually not only talking about DAC device on 32-bit cpus.
David> Just as much, I'm talking about drivers for SAC-only devices
David> even on 64-bit cpus.

David> I took a lot of crap from driver authors when we started
David> pushing the PCI dma stuff on people, because of the dma_addr_t
David> people now had to keep around to unmap the thing later.

David> To a certain extent I agreed with these folks. I'll be gutting
David> myself if I make everyone eat twice as much space just to add
David> DAC support to the kernel :-)

The overhead is going be negligeble, the overhead of highmem itself is
much worse. Not to mention that today some dma_addr_t's might not be
packed properly in data structure hence they ending up taking 8 bytes
anyway.

Jes
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 12:56    [W:0.049 / U:5.164 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site