Messages in this thread |  | | Date | Sat, 9 Jun 2001 13:45:30 -0400 (EDT) | | From | Alexander Viro <> | | Subject | Re: [CHECKER] a couple potential deadlocks in 2.4.5-ac8 |
| |
On 9 Jun 2001, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> The big kernel lock rules are that it's a "normal spinlock" in many > regards, BUT you can block while holding it, and the BKL will magically > be released during the blocking. This means, for example, that the BKL > can never deadlock with a semaphore - if a BKL holder blocks on sombody > elses semaphore (and that somebody else wants the BKL), then the act of > blocking on the semaphore will release the BKL, and allow the original > semaphore holder to continue.
Another difference from spinlocks is that BKL is recursive. I'm actually surprised that it didn't show up first.
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
|  |