Messages in this thread |  | | From | "H. Peter Anvin" <> | | Subject | Re: temperature standard - global config option? | | Date | 9 Jun 2001 00:57:42 -0700 |
| |
Followup to: <20010608191600.A12143@alcove.wittsend.com> By author: "Michael H. Warfield" <mhw@wittsend.com> In newsgroup: linux.dev.kernel > > Yes, bits are free, sort of... That's why an extra decimal > place is "ok". Keeping precision within an order of magnitude of > accuracy is within the realm of reasonable. Running out to two decimal > places for this particular application is just silly. If it were for > calibrated lab equipment, fine. But not for CPU temperatures. >
Do you want to bet that that is going to remain the case, or are you just assuming the current state of the art will continue to be used forever? That is extremely poor interface design. Designing interfaces is NOT the same thing as judging science fairs and presenting data.
-hpa -- <hpa@transmeta.com> at work, <hpa@zytor.com> in private! "Unix gives you enough rope to shoot yourself in the foot." http://www.zytor.com/~hpa/puzzle.txt - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
|  |