Messages in this thread |  | | Subject | Re: temperature standard - global config option? | | From | Bill Pringlemeir <> | | Date | 08 Jun 2001 20:13:01 -0400 |
| |
>>>>> "MHW" == Michael H Warfield <mhw@wittsend.com> writes: [snip] MHW> Yes, bits are free, sort of... That's why an extra decimal MHW> place is "ok". Keeping precision within an order of magnitude MHW> of accuracy is within the realm of reasonable. Running out to MHW> two decimal places for this particular application is just MHW> silly. If it were for calibrated lab equipment, fine. But not MHW> for CPU temperatures.
You do introduce some rounding errors if the measurement isn't in Celsius or Kelvin. Ie, you must do a conversion because the hardware isn't in the desired units. In this case, the extra precision will be beneficial.
If you are going your route, you should send error bars with all the measurements ;-) Fine, too many decimals leads to a false sense of security. However, no one knows the accuracy of any future temperature sensors so why not accommodate the possibility. Certainly some band gap semis can give a pretty good measurement if you have good coupling. If the temperature sensor was built into the CPU, you might actually have accuracy!
regards, Bill Pringlemeir.
This thread keeps going and going and going...
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
|  |