Messages in this thread |  | | Subject | Re: Break 2.4 VM in five easy steps | | From | (Eric W. Biederman) | | Date | 07 Jun 2001 01:59:44 -0600 |
| |
Mike Galbraith <mikeg@wen-online.de> writes:
> On 7 Jun 2001, Eric W. Biederman wrote: > > > Does this improve the swapoff speed or just allow other programs to > > run at the same time? If it is still slow under that kind of load it > > would be interesting to know what is taking up all time. > > > > If it is no longer slow a patch should be made and sent to Linus. > > No, it only cures the freeze. The other appears to be the slow code > pointed out by Andrew Morton being tickled by dead swap pages.
O.k. I think I'm ready to nominate the dead swap pages for the big 2.4.x VM bug award. So we are burning cpu cycles in sys_swapoff instead of being IO bound? Just wanting to understand this the cheap way :)
Eric - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
|  |