[lkml]   [2001]   [Jun]   [7]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: Background scanning change on 2.4.6-pre1
>> > This is going to make all pages have age 0 on an idle system after some
>> > time (the old code from Rik which has been replaced by this code tried to
>> > avoid that)
>There's another reason why I think the patch may be ok even without any
>added logic: not only does it simplify the code and remove a illogical
>heuristic, but there is nothing that really says that "age 0" is
>necessarily very bad.

Here's my take on it. The point of ageing is twofold - to age down pages
that aren't in use, and to age up pages that *are* in use. So, pages that
are in use will remain with high ages even when background scanning is
being done, and pages that aren't in use will decay to zero age.

I can't see what's wrong with that. When we need more memory, it's a Very
Good Thing to know that most of the pages in the system haven't been
accessed in yonks - we know exactly which ones we want to throw out first.

from: Jonathan "Chromatix" Morton
mail: (not for attachments)

The key to knowledge is not to rely on people to teach you it.

GCS$/E/S dpu(!) s:- a20 C+++ UL++ P L+++ E W+ N- o? K? w--- O-- M++$ V? PS
PE- Y+ PGP++ t- 5- X- R !tv b++ DI+++ D G e+ h+ r++ y+(*)

To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 12:55    [W:0.066 / U:0.236 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site